Monk Seal Fact Files
Mediterranean Monk Seal
(Monachus monachus)
Conservation
Conservation priorities
Alarmed by the monk seal’s dwindling numbers, scientists,
conservationists and government representatives from 22
countries met in Rhodes, Greece in 1978 to identify
threats and priorities for remedial action.
The landmark conference drew up a comprehensive list of
threats facing the species across its range, as well as a
raft of measures to combat them (Ronald & Duguy eds.
1979, Israëls 1992, Johnson & Lavigne 1998).
Priorities included:
- Effective international coordination of
monk seal conservation activities.
- Effective enforcement of legislation
prohibiting the direct killing and harassment of monk
seals, and government actions to encourage coexistence
between fishers and seals.
- Benign scientific research to identify and
monitor monk seal habitat areas.
- The establishment of a network of reserves
and protected areas.
- Education and public awareness programmes.
- Rescue and rehabilitation of wounded,
stranded and orphaned seals.
Numerous meetings followed in the wake of the Rhodes
Conference, yet all generally reiterated and re-emphasised
its recommendations and conservation priorities. Arguably,
it is this that speaks most eloquently of the one
overriding and persistent problem affecting monk seal
conservation: the failure to translate recommendations,
priorities and even international treaty obligations into
effective actions (Johnson & Lavigne 1999b).
The powerful economic forces arrayed against the monk
seal (tourism, fishing, coastal development), coupled with
chronic deficiencies in funding, both from the state and
private sectors, have only served to undermine
conservation efforts (Johnson & Lavigne 1999b, Johnson
2004).
As a consequence, progress in the conservation of the
species and its habitat has generally been patchy and
slow. The monk seal’s obscurity among the general public
has only served to compound problems already stemming from
lack of influence and resources.
“An extensive information campaign
throughout the Mediterranean, must be launched
at once to sensitise the public to the drastic
status of the monk seal and to mobilise
political and financial support for the urgent
measures needed. The monk seal should be adopted
as the symbol of Mediterranean conservation.
NGOs, researchers, governments and international
agencies should coordinate their‑information
activities for the greatest possible impact.
Support for the campaign from the business
community should be encouraged.” (UNEP 1988)
|
Despite some early suggestions, there has been no
concerted attempt to portray the Mediterranean monk seal
as an ecological symbol or indicator species of the
Mediterranean, a concept that sought to draw much-needed
attention to the inter-relating conservation problems
affecting the coastal/marine environment, humans included
(Ronald & Duguy eds. 1979, UNEP 1988, Johnson ed.
2004c).
The holistic approach that this implies and the
integrated solutions that would necessarily stem from it,
has also remained elusive. Despite significant potential,
there has been no serious or adequately-funded effort to
draw coastal dwellers into the conservation process. In
most monk seal MPAs, alternative economic development
attuned to the protection rather than the exploitation of
nature remains an unfulfilled aspiration – and with little
prospect of becoming otherwise in the foreseeable future.
Management authorities possess neither the funds nor the
qualified staff to be able to develop, hand-in-hand with
local communities, the alternative economic opportunities
that would ultimately help to make the MPAs viable in the
long term (Johnson & Lavigne 1999b, Johnson 2004a,
2004b).
Encouraging coexistence between seals and fishermen
through direct aid, community assistance schemes and
involvement in MPA monitoring or management remains far
from widespread, although such measures have played a
significant role in Turkey and Mauritania (see Marine
protected areas and no-fishing zones).
© 2006 monachus-guardian.org. All Rights Reserved.
Citation and copyright.
|